Web Survey Bibliography
Title From PAPI to CAPI: consequences for data quality on the British Household Panel Study
Author Laurie, H.
Source Working Papers of the Institute for Social and Economic Research, Colchester: University of Essex, paper 2003-14
Year 2003
Access date 09.08.2004
Full text pdf (76k)
Abstract This paper describes the conversion from PAPI to CAPI of the British Household Panel Survey (BHPS) and examines the implications of the move to CAPI for data quality. The BHPS is a panel survey of some 10,000 individuals in 5,000 households in Britain carried out by the Institute for Social and Economic Research (ISER) based at the University of Essex in the UK. Wave 9 of the BHPS went into the field using a CAPI mode of data collection for the first time in September 1999. Moving to CAPI midway in the life of a panel survey presents particular challenges including comparability of questionnaire design, secure fieldwork and sample management procedures, minimising mode effects, maintaining data quality, ensuring a positive response from respondents, adequate interviewer training and experience, and having secure data output routines in place. The paper describes the procedures adopted by the BHPS, including the design conventions implemented to maintain comparability between the PAPI and CAPI instruments, and the procedures used in the field to minimise any adverse reaction from panel respondents. The paper then assesses whether any mode effects are apparent within the data. The paper examines monetary amounts such as reported housing costs and income, the consistency of ome key measures such as economic activity status, occupation and industry, as well as questions requiring verbatim text entry and post-field coding. Using the PAPI data from earlier waves and the CAPI data from Wave 9, the data are compared to assess both cross-sectional consistency in the distributions as well as longitudinal comparability.
Access/Direct link ISER (full text)
Year of publication2003
Bibliographic typeReports, seminars
Web survey bibliography - Reports, seminars (231)
- Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys 2016; 2016
- Standard Definitions Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys; 2016
- FocusVision 2015 Annual MR Technology Report; 2016; Macer, T., Wilson, S.
- Establishing the accuracy of online panels for survey research; 2016; Bruggen, E.; van den Brakel, J.; Krosnick, J. A.
- Mixing modes of data collection in Swiss social surveys: Methodological report of the LIVES-FORS mixed...; 2016; Roberts, C.; Joye, D.; Staehli, M. E.
- Assessment of Innovations in Data Collection Technology for Understanding Society; 2016; Couper, M. P.
- Report of the Inquiry into the 2015 British general election opinion polls; 2016; Sturgis, P., Baker, N., Callegaro, M., Fisher, St., Green, J., Jennings, W., Kuha, J., Lauderdale, B...
- Evaluating a New Proposal for Detecting Data Falsification in Surveys; 2016; Simmons, K.; Mercer, A. W.; Schwarzer, S.; Courtney, K.
- Computer-assisted and online data collection in general population surveys; 2016; Skarupova, K.
- Predictive inference for non-probability samples: a simulation study ; 2016; Buelens, B.; Burger, J.; van den Brakel, J.
- ESOMAR/GRBN Online Research Guideline; 2015
- App vs. Web for Surveys of Smartphone Users: Experimenting with mobile apps for signal-contingent experience...; 2015; McGeeney, K.; Keeter, S.; Igielnik, R.; Smith, A.; Rainie, L.
- On Climbing Stairs Many Steps at a Time: The New Normal in Survey Methodology; 2015; Dillman, D. A.
- Polling Error in the 2015 UK General Election: An Analysis of YouGov’s Pre and Post-Election Polls...; 2015; Wells, A.; Rivers, D.
- GreenBook Research Industry Trends Report; 2015; Murphy, L. (Ed.)
- Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys 2015; 2015
- Methodology of the RAND Mid-Term 2014 Election Panel; 2015; Carman, K. G; Pollack, S.
- 28 Questions to Help Buyers of Online Samples; 2015; Cape, P. J.; Phillips, A.; Baker, R.; Cooke, M.; Ribeiro, E.; Terhanian, G.
- Understanding Society Innovation Panel Wave 7: Results from Methodological Experiments; 2015; Blom, A. G.; Burton, J.; Booker, C. L.; Cernat, A.; Fairbrother, M.; Jaeckle, A.; Kaminska, O.; Keusch...
- Tips for Creating Web Surveys for Completion on a Mobile Device; 2015; McGeeney, K.
- U.S. Survey Research: Sampling; 2015
- A Comparison of Different Online Sampling Approaches for Generating National Samples; 2014; Heen, M. S. J., Lieberman, J. D., Miethe, T. D.
- FocusVision 2014 Annual MR Technology Report; 2014; Macer, T., Wilson, S.
- The Changing Landscape of Technology and its Effect on Online Survey Data Collection; 2014; Mitchell, N.
- Query on Data Collection for Social Surveys; 2014; Blanke, K., Luiten, A.
- The role of email addresses and email contact in encouraging web response in a mixed mode design ; 2014; Cernat, A., Lynn, P.
- Mixed-mode surveys of the general population - Results from the European Social Survey mixed-mode experiment...; 2014; Park, A., Humphrey, A.
- Mixed-Mode Designs bei Erhebungen mit sensitiven Fragen: Einfluss auf das Teilnahme- und Antwortverhalten...; 2014; Krug, G., Kriwy, P., Carstensen, J.
- Methods and systems for managing an online opinion survey service; 2014; Mcloughlin, M. H., Seton, N., Blesy, K.
- Mobile Technologies for Conducting, Augmenting and Potentially Replacing Surveys: Report of the AAPOR...; 2014; Link, M. W., Murphy, J., Schober, M. F., Buskirk, T. D., Childs, J. H., Tesfaye, C.
- The use of within-subject experiments for estimating measurement effects in mixed-mode surveys ; 2014; Klausch, L. T., Schouten, B., Hox, J.
- Measuring well-being: An analysis of different response scales; 2014; van Beuningen, J., van der Houwen, K., Moonen, L.
- The impact of contact effort and interviewer performance on mode-specific nonresponse and measurement...; 2014; Schouten, B., Cobben, F., van der Laan, J., Arends, J.
- Community Life Survey: Summary of web experiment findings; 2013
- The Short-term Campaign Panel of the German Longitudinal Election Study 2009. Design, Implementation...; 2013; Steinbrecher, M., Rossmann, J.
- Too Fast, Too Straight, Too Weird: Post Hoc Identification of Meaningless Data in Internet ; 2013; Leiner, D. J.
- Postal recruitment into a longitudinal online panel survey. The effects of different number of reminder...; 2013; Martinsson, J.
- The world in 2013. ICT facts and figures; 2013
- Microsoft Security Intelligence Report, Volume 15; 2013
- A Comparison of Results from a Spanish and English Mail Survey: Effects of Instruction Placement on...; 2013; Wang, K., Sha, M.
- Research Note: Reducing the Threat of Sensitive Questions in Online Surveys?; 2013; Couper, M. P.
- Global market research 2013; 2013
- Exploring the Digital Nation: America’s Emerging Online Experience; 2013
- Advantages of a global multimodal print & digital readership survey; 2013; Cour, N., Saint-Joanis, G.
- Australia: building a 21st century readership survey; 2013; Green, A., White, H.
- The new swiss national readership survey: fit for the future ; 2013; Amschler, H., Hoffmann, J.
- ESS Mixed Mode Experiment Results in Estonia (CAWI and CAPI Mode Sequential Design); 2013; Ainsaar, M., Lilleoja, L., Lumiste, K., Roots, A.
- Using smartphones in survey research: a multifunctional tool Implementation of a time use app; a feasability...; 2013; Sonck, N., Fernee, H.
- Adaptive survey designs to minimize survey mode effects. A case study on the Dutch Labour Force Survey...; 2013; Calinescu, M., Schouten, B.
- Optimal Resource Allocation in Adaptive Survey Designs; 2013; Calinescu, M.